Trustees, Front Men, Trusted Individuals, and Consumer Invoices: How They Work in Practice

In today’s article, we will explain how figures such as nominees, trustees, trusted individuals, front men, and consumer invoices work in practice. We will look at what they consist of, what risks they involve, how they can be used in international structures, and how far you can go without crossing the line into illegality. We will also introduce our new matchmaking service.

Denationalize.me has undoubtedly become one of the largest sources of information on free living around the world, but not only that, it has also given rise to a huge community of like-minded people who come together at our various meetings and events.

We are all united not only by the need to be freer and escape the system, but also by the virtues of serious entrepreneurs, investors, and freelancers, in which there is no room for fraud or other crimes. The Denationalize.me community is the ideal place for freedom-loving but principled people who want to optimize their lives internationally or have already done so. So why not harness the power of this community to find mutual support?

This idea came to us a few years ago, and although it has been a minority project so far, we now want to explain it in more detail in this article. We have been doing this on a small scale for three years, mainly for our consulting clients. The offer will continue to be limited to clients who pay for our services, as this will allow us to maintain a certain filter. Any of our various advisory services or company incorporation services will entitle you to apply for it. Anyone will be able to make an offer, as these will be scarcer.

A community of like-minded people, including the stateless community, is based on trust. There can always be bad apples that need to be discarded. But most are interested in contributing their knowledge to free more people from dominant state systems. With our “matching database,” they will have the opportunity to do so and, in addition, generate passive income.

The idea is simple: we leverage the power of our community to connect entrepreneurs seeking structural solutions with other expatriate entrepreneurs who have already found them. Those who already enjoy a happy life in tax havens can help those who are still stuck in their home country to optimize their taxes and, at the same time, earn additional income. This may be of particular interest to emigrant couples who are the sole breadwinners for their families, as it allows them to generate a second source of income with little effort.

The applications are as varied as the jurisdictions under consideration. Our matching service focuses on three key areas that are in high demand but difficult for us to offer as a service directly for legal reasons, as the risk of abuse and legal consequences does not justify the benefit. On a personal level, however, between two people in the Denationalize.me community, this risk is much lower, as they do not publicly expose their solution or offer it professionally. Instead of resorting to expensive and sometimes unreliable service providers, we want to democratize these situations for the benefit of both parties. We cannot offer guarantees, but in this article, we want to explain the possible applications of the service, as well as address the associated risks and solutions. Ultimately, it is up to you to decide whether or not you want to take advantage of this service.

Opportunities and risks of our matching database

The three typical situations for users of our matching database are: intermediation by managers or administrators, intermediation by trusted individuals, and intermediation to obtain utility bills. There is a huge need in these areas, and there is no doubt that a freedom-loving community can support each other in this regard. Below, we will analyze all situations in detail and provide corresponding examples.

In general, the goal is to legally optimize a tax or regulatory situation so that person “A,” who has already emigrated, can be useful to person “B,” who still remains in their country of origin, and, of course, receive financial compensation for their services. Similarly, person ‘B’ may be able to help person “A” in other ways.

Person A, for example, could be a perpetual traveler with tax residence in Paraguay, an ideal situation for being an administrator or trusted person with regard to the business needs of person B. On the other hand, person A would like to have an address in Spain for an extended period of time without this directly implying a tax obligation for having their tax residence there. Person B appreciates the tax optimization provided by person A (who has helped them with the effective address/business substrate) and rents an apartment in a country (it could be Spain, France, or wherever) for person A’s use. Given that person B already resides in a country with high tax rates (Spain in this case), renting another home in Spain, France, Germany, or wherever has no direct tax relevance for them, as they will always remain a tax resident in Spain, where they actually live. Person B could thus use a home in Europe without exposing themselves to the risk of attracting the attention of the local tax authorities (in a completely legal manner as long as they do not spend too much time in the country).

This small example can be extended to numerous circumstances and jurisdictions. People cooperate for mutual benefit and, in this way, circumvent the state in a completely legal manner. Person A can spend up to six months in “their” home without running the risk of having to pay taxes. Person B saves, for example, 15% in corporate tax compared to their country of origin, as person A has taken over the management of their foreign company in Bulgaria and provides the necessary substance for this. They can offset the value of their respective advantages between themselves or settle them as appropriate. More information on this can be found in the following sections.

Of course, many will think of the famous “front man,” who is often a criminal. Undoubtedly, a “front man” runs the risk of subsidiary liability, while the entrepreneur runs the risk that the “front man” will betray him or run away with the money. However, we are convinced that these risks are minimized, even if they cannot be avoided 100%. This is primarily because the Denationalize.me community, in its fundamental pursuit of freedom, is made up of ethically responsible people who see the mutual advantages. Those who defend free markets know that cooperation can always be beneficial for everyone and that if one person cheats, both lose. An administrator who holds a position only on paper in the commercial register to hide something will not want to give up passive income without compensation that he or she only obtains by lending his or her name. In this situation, he or she does not have or need a power of attorney, i.e., neither a high official salary nor access to a company account, as is usually necessary. They may earn less money, but in return they have to do practically nothing. Consequently, their counterpart also does not want to do without the cheap “front man.” It is not easy to find someone to fill such a position responsibly.

Both parties take a mutual risk and, of course, must transparently disclose their respective arrangements to the other party. If an entrepreneur does not want to show the potential administrator the accounts and balance sheet, or at least the bank statements from previous activities or a concrete business plan for the future, they should be suspicious. The potential trusted person must be absolutely sure that no shady business is being conducted with the company they are managing and request all the information necessary to know this. In this way, they will also automatically reduce the risk of subsidiary liability considerably. Even if you hold a position in the company, you should not completely disconnect. Access to the accounts used or, at least, the receipt of a monthly bank statement should be expressly demanded to ensure transparency.

The question of whether to protect yourself by signing a typical fiduciary agreement or any other type of contract depends largely on the configuration used. After all, contracts can also be breached, and precisely when the “trusted person” is in the ‘right’ or “wrong” countries, depending on your point of view, they can get away with it without any consequences. That is why it is so important to properly investigate the person. The entrepreneur should not shy away from typical due diligence regarding the person’s life situation, financial situation, and future plans, with the corresponding evidence. If the trusted person is not willing to provide this, they should not be trusted. At least one meeting is recommended to get to know each other. If the “appointment” is not satisfactory, this should be clearly communicated and the next attempt made.

In the case of persons acting as trusted individuals and economic beneficiaries, combining the roles of partner and manager of the company, it would generally not be a good idea to sign any type of contract. If such a contract were to come to light, there would be a possibility that it is actually a “front man,” which would be illegal and (if it came to light) the company would be attributed to the actual user. This also carries the potential for blackmail, especially by the trusted person, who could hand over the contract to the tax authorities in the event of a disagreement. This does not always lead directly to investigations and real consequences, but it is important to be aware of the risk. The key here is trust rather than the contract.

Even if the trusted person is registered as a partner in the company, they are not required to have access to the accounts. In a world of online banks without branches and with two-factor authentication, it is not difficult to prevent the trusted person from accessing the accounts. All that is needed is your data and, sometimes, your physical presence to complete the process (for selfies and so on). Of course, this person could identify themselves to the bank with the appropriate title and thus take control of the account. This can happen especially in banks with branches in other countries (as we said, it would be much more difficult in the case of neobanks that only operate online). All counterparties should be aware of this risk and, in the best case scenario, not leave large sums in accounts to avoid sudden temptations. The trusted person does not need to know what is in the account, but, on the other hand, they do have a legitimate interest in being aware of transactions so that they are not held responsible for criminal activities.

On the other hand, if we are talking about an administrator, it is essential that there are contracts in place and that the administrator has access to the company’s bank account. Otherwise, it is not possible to demonstrate actual management (effective management) and we will not be able to benefit fiscally from having a company abroad. The administrator must be able to manage the company, receive adequate remuneration (a typical salary for the role they are assuming), and be able to demonstrate access to the company’s bank account in order to carry out operations in a transparent manner. If this is not the case, it could be suspected that it is merely a fiduciary relationship, and the tax authorities would consider that the company does not have sufficient business substance.

In this case, there are also solutions, such as two-factor authentication, multiple signatures, or the use of several company accounts, of which the CEO only has access to one of lesser importance. For example, they have access to the transaction account, but not to the liquidity account, to which periodic transfers are made.

On the other hand, when we talk about an administrator to provide a basis for your foreign company, it is less likely that such an administrator could breach the contract without consequences, since, in the best case scenario, the administrator resides in the same country where the company is based, which is usually a country with legal certainty and properly regulated where he or she could be sued for breach of duty. Although it is not mandatory for the administrator to have their tax residence in the same country where the company they manage is located, it is more credible and safer for the entrepreneur if this is the case. In many jurisdictions, such as Switzerland, Cyprus, and Singapore, it is even mandatory to have a local administrator (although, on the other hand, a fiduciary administrator would suffice).

In principle, the most important thing to prevent a foreign company from being treated as a domestic company for tax purposes is that the effective management is located outside the country where the partner who has commissioned the management resides. Thus, a Bulgarian company could function perfectly well with a director in Paraguay. However, in many EU countries there are minimum substance requirements that practically require a local managing director. In order to operate a Cypriot limited company without tax residence in Cyprus, for example, a valid place of business with an employee residing in Cyprus with a salary of €450 is required.

Often, having a local administrator also allows for considerable cost savings, as the administrator’s private residence can be used as a place of business. Nowadays, with common online business models, it is not unusual to operate a company from a room in your home rather than from an office. These savings can be used to pay the director a higher salary, thereby strengthening the credibility of the structure. Precisely in cases where the director does not have to pay tax on their salary, or only has to pay a small amount, the entrepreneur has the opportunity to recoup the money in other ways. There are no limits to creativity here.

To verify the substance of a foreign company, the tax authorities pay attention not only to credible economic interest, but above all to the demonstrable existence of a commercial center of operations and proof that the CEO is subject to social security contributions. When there is no social security or taxes, it must be possible to present at least a contract and the corresponding tax residence certificate. As we have said, it is better for the salary paid to be too high than too low. A salary that is too low indicates an activity that is not very credible or a fiduciary relationship that may make it difficult for the tax authorities to recognize the basis. In the worst case, this means tax evasion or, at the very least, taxation according to the corporate tax legislation of the partners’ country of residence. To avoid these problems, you must accept the possible taxes on salaries and social security contributions in order to ensure a sound legal basis. In any case, the jurisdictions that are most attractive due to their low corporate taxes also tend to have low income taxes and social security contributions.

When drafting the contract, it may be advisable to consult a lawyer in the relevant country to minimize the risks of civil liability for both parties. In any case, it is highly recommended to know the administrator well, as well as a trusted person, even if they are hired on a contract basis. In this case, the administrator assumes the risk of civil liability for serious errors that occur in the company. Of course, such an administrator must also have some knowledge of the business model. The ideal situation is, of course, a real administrator who takes on administrative or value-creating tasks in the company. This model is, of course, the most recommendable, as it is the most credible. And it is often not that difficult to implement. Anyone who wants to pay only 5% tax at the company level in Malta has a large number of entrepreneurs at their disposal who have moved there and can fill this position. The situation is similar in almost all other tax havens. The entrepreneur may even be from the same industry, but at the very least they will have certain business management skills that they can contribute as a director in another company. Between two successful entrepreneurs, trust issues should be minimal. It is highly unlikely that a well-paid entrepreneur would jeopardize their own success to run off with someone else’s money. Therefore, conditions are optimal among members of the Denationalize.me community.

In the case of a trustee, the situation is different. Although they hold the position of administrators, they do not actually exercise any control over the company. Trustees (or partners), also known as nominees, serve primarily to conceal information about the actual owners and administrators in the commercial register. Except in a few countries, they are generally not sufficient to create the necessary substrate. Almost all professional services in the field of management are ultimately fiduciary and therefore rarely sufficient to create a credible business substrate. Although greater legal certainty can be enjoyed thanks to fiduciary contracts, credibility is lost and, in most cases, a lot of money has to be paid. Trustees are usually lawyers or their employees, who are subject to a particularly strict duty of loyalty under the law. However, there are also numerous cases of renowned lawyers who, faced with large sums of money, have succumbed to temptation, emptied a company account, and left the country, breaching all contracts.

It is often much more difficult to evaluate foreign law firms and their motivations than those in the community. In addition, they often charge much more than would be necessary for a favor between people in the same profession. In fact, a typical fiduciary contract poses no risk to the trustee, who does little more than associate his name with the company. The contract generally excludes them from any joint liability for the company’s actions. It usually grants unlimited power to the actual administrator and removes all power from the trustee by presenting a unilateral signed waiver, which the actual UBO only has to countersign to release the trustee from all their duties. However, this does not provide 100% protection against possible abuse.

The use of trustees is only interpreted as real business substance in a few tax havens that do not carry out overly strict controls. Cyprus, for example, wants to verify that, in the distribution of dividends from a foreign company, the partner residing in Cyprus is not also the general manager. In this case, a simple trustee in the commercial register is sufficient, allowing for favorable solutions for tax-exempt foreign companies at a total cost of less than €5,000. This is by no means the case with inspections by the Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, German, etc. authorities. Although many entrepreneurs continue to get away with using trustees, it is not a recommended approach. In any case, pure trustees are now hardly useful for obtaining tax advantages due to the transparency register of beneficial owners. Today, the use of a trustee is more to prevent competitors or your employer from knowing who is behind a company than for anything else. In the EU, only Malta has a transparency register that is not completely public. Even many tax havens, such as the British Overseas Territories, the Cayman Islands, the British Virgin Islands, and Bermuda, or the United Arab Emirates, have had to act in this regard for some time due to external pressure. Only in the case of the United States is the filing of FinCen BOI information currently suspended due to several court rulings. Furthermore, the US transparency register is not publicly accessible and serves only to enable US authorities to identify the true beneficiaries of local companies.

Trust agreements may make sense in certain circumstances but are generally not suitable for obtaining legal tax advantages. Within the stateless community, there is the advantage of being able to choose from German-language names, which are difficult to find in many countries. In addition, the remuneration for virtually risk-free income is probably lower than that demanded by professional trustees, even though they hold positions in dozens of companies at the same time. This can also be an advantage for the trustee who registers in our matching database. If you only hold one position, you are much more likely to be successful in banking with your KYC.

Ultimately, the risks for both parties depend largely on the structure, configuration, and jurisdiction. The Swiss administrator of a Swiss limited company owned by a Spanish owner is much more legally exposed than the administrator of a Seychelles limited company residing in Vanuatu or Paraguay. In the following paragraphs, we want to illustrate the three essential aspects in practice and select the most interesting examples.

The trusted person in practice

Structures involving trusted persons are much more common than most people think. If a parent who emigrates donates all of their shares in their limited liability company to their child who remains in the country in order to avoid the exit tax, we are actually talking about the use of a trusted person, just as when we talk about the woman who runs and owns her husband’s limited liability company, which is in a state of insolvency.

So where can we find trusted persons? Often, in addition to family members, trusted persons can be found among close friends or business partners. If only one of several partners is willing to emigrate, the others can benefit greatly from this. In some cases, it may also be in their interest to give up their shares, for example, because they also plan to emigrate in the medium term and do not want to be subject to exit tax. Once everyone has emigrated, the partners who initially gave up their shares buy the shares at a minimum price from the trusted person (for this to work, of course, they will have to reside in the appropriate countries).

The trusted person is also the UBO, i.e., the ultimate beneficial owner. There are no contracts, only trust. In this way, the tax authorities cannot take action against these structures. When trust is reciprocated, it allows entrepreneurs (and investors) to run tax-exempt foreign companies, even if they are residents of countries with high tax rates.

Any Perpetual Tourist can register a tax-exempt company and act as a trusted person for an entrepreneur residing in a country with high tax pressure. Of course, if necessary, the entrepreneur residing in the country with high tax pressure will have to be able to credibly justify to their clients that it is not them or their company that is invoicing for their work. One way to avoid problems here would be for the entrepreneur to invoice the trusted person’s tax-free company for their work and to invoice the service provided at the lowest possible price.

As long as the money remains in the Perpetual Tourist’s tax-free company, no illegal act has been committed. It is only considered illegal if the foreign company’s funds become part of the entrepreneur’s private assets. However, anyone who saves and invests money in the company controlled by the trusted person and only recovers it once they have emigrated would not run any legal risk. In the event of receiving advance payments, for example, for the use of company credit cards or the receipt of loans, this would carry a certain risk that each person would have to assess for themselves.

If you have a trusted person in a country with low or no taxes, the possibilities are almost limitless. However, you can also obtain certain advantages in reverse by having trusted persons in countries with high tax pressure. Because everything that you can no longer do as a perpetual traveler can often be done without any problems by someone from a country with high tax pressure. We are talking above all about long-term rentals without incurring the corresponding tax liability for permanent availability. Countries with high tax burdens often have double taxation agreements with each other that prevent, for example, a resident of Argentina, Mexico, or Spain who rents a home in Germany or Portugal on a long-term basis from becoming a tax resident in those countries. So, anyone who wants to have a base in a problematic country can rent a home through a trusted person. Of course, the person in the country with high tax pressure is also perfect as an official representative or unofficial trusted person to register a vehicle or take out insurance. Perhaps the trusted person can also apply for a loan that you cannot obtain.

Here you can be creative and support each other with the advantages of your personal situation. Everyone should think of specific examples. The important thing is that, as a rule, the trusted person resides in a tax-free and largely unregulated country, while the person hiring them usually has their tax residence in a country with high tax pressure. In some cases, such as the examples mentioned at the beginning of donating shares in a limited company, personal insolvency, and many others, a trusted person in the same country where you reside may also be useful, especially if you do not have a trusted person in your family.

The general manager in practice

We will now look at the possibilities that exist for managers with formal employment who are not, however, ultimate beneficial owners or UBOs (if they were, we would be talking about a trusted person). In this case, the objective is usually to accumulate wealth in the foreign company by paying less tax than you would with a domestic company in the UBO’s country. But there may also be other scenarios, such as the mere concealment of the position of administrator (for example, when there is no transparency register, but there is a commercial register), usually with a fiduciary contract.

Generally, in most tax structures that allow you to avoid paying taxes, it is possible and often even advantageous to have an administrator who resides outside the country where the company is registered. This is the case, for example, with US LLCs. Having a manager or administrator residing in the US usually triggers what is known as ETBUS, or “Effectively Connected Income from a Trade or Business in the United States.” Although this does not require taxation on foreign income, it does require the LLC to pay taxes on US income, with the corresponding obligation to keep accounts and file tax returns. Those who are willing to accept this, or even want to do so anyway, can also appoint any U.S. person as an administrator. However, those who have U.S.-source income (on which they would have to pay taxes) or want to avoid bureaucracy can appoint a foreign administrator for their LLC and thus avoid negative consequences in the United States. To avoid establishing a permanent presence in the LLC owner’s country (and having to pay taxes there), it is generally only necessary for business activities to be carried out outside the country of residence, regardless of whether they are carried out in the United States or elsewhere.

In any case, for residents of countries with high tax pressure, the LLC is not usually fiscally advantageous. The profits of this fiscally transparent LLC would not be tax-free despite having a foreign-resident manager; we would need the UBO (ultimate beneficial owner) to reside abroad as well.

When residing in a country with high tax pressure, the best option is generally to rely on a capital company with its own legal personality that is not fiscally transparent. Following the same pattern (having a local administrator, Perpetual Tourist, or resident in a tax-free country), corporate taxes can be reduced by choosing the right country for the company. Although there is no advantage here when it comes to receiving dividends, the corporate tax burden can be reduced to 5 or 10%, sometimes even to 0%.

In addition to the typical European tax havens such as Cyprus, Malta, and Ireland, Eastern European countries are particularly interesting, as wage and non-wage costs are much lower. Potential general managers from Balkan countries such as Bulgaria, Bosnia, or Montenegro have interesting opportunities here, as the lower the costs, the more worthwhile it is to accumulate wealth.

A typical Bulgarian company with assets should be able to register for a total cost of €15,000. With an average saving of 15% (10% corporate tax in Bulgaria), a tax advantage is already achieved with profits of less than €100,000. In countries with higher costs or taxes for the administrator, we will need to have slightly higher profits to make it worthwhile, of course. In any case, these types of structures are almost always worthwhile from around €200,000 in profits, especially if they allow us to avoid dealing with a tax authority as capricious and erratic as the Spanish one.

If you are also going to work in the UBO’s country of residence, it is essential to pay attention to the double taxation agreements between the country of the foreign company and the partner’s country of residence so that you are not attributed a permanent establishment.

Below, we will compare the most attractive countries for setting up a company and their corporate taxes. Potential administrators living in these countries could face high demand. It should also be noted that we are always talking about resident companies that can effectively apply the double taxation agreement. We will list all countries with a tax burden of up to 15%, which, compared to many countries with high tax pressure, often already means a halving of the tax burden.

0% corporate tax:

• Singapore with exemption for startups (otherwise 8.5% up to 200,000, 17%)
• Panama (foreign income)
• Emirates (up to USD 100,000 in profits)
• Hong Kong (foreign income, up to USD 500,000)
• Various free trade zones (investment and staffing requirements)

2.5% corporate tax

• Cyprus with IP-Box (only for software, patents, etc.)

4% corporate tax

• Canary Islands Special Zone (3-5 employees, €50-100,000 investment)

5% corporate tax

• Malta
• Madeira (1 employee, €50,000 investment)
• Georgia IT Zone (5% withholding tax) or International Zone (5% corporate tax)
• Lithuania (up to €300,000)

9% corporate tax:

• Hungary
• Poland (up to €2 million in turnover)
• Montenegro
• United Arab Emirates (no tax below €100,000 in profits or approximately €260,000 (AED 1 million) in turnover).

10% corporate tax

• Bulgaria
• Bosnia and Herzegovina
• Croatia (up to €1 million in turnover)
• North Macedonia

12.5% corporate tax:

• Cyprus
• Ireland
• Liechtenstein
• Switzerland (11.5% + depending on the canton/municipality)

15% corporate tax:

• Georgia (but only after distribution)
• Serbia
• Mauritius (3% on foreign income)

The utility bill (for KYC processes) in practice

Another issue is the utility bill for banking KYC purposes. This is one of the big topics in the community of perpetual tourists and travelers. In this regard, you can help each other perfectly.

In fact, there are no professional providers for this type of bill for good reason: the potential for abuse in the KYC procedure is high, and if it is offered in a standardized way, you could quickly become an accomplice to tax evasion, money laundering, or more serious crimes. In a few isolated countries, solutions can be found clandestinely, but in principle, you have to obtain the utility bill yourself.

However, taking care of it yourself does not necessarily mean buying or renting a property directly. In many countries, utility bills can be transferred to another person relatively easily. For example, you can pay for a landline or internet connection and put it in the name of an acquaintance who lives there without actually having to live there yourself. In some cases, this is even possible with electricity, water, or gas bills.

Unlike when we falsify a utility bill, this is a legal and verifiable solution, even if you don’t actually live at that address. Ideally, the owner will give you an “alibi” if asked, but we don’t know of any cases where this has been necessary. Depending on the case, it is also worth agreeing with the relevant person to forward any mail you may receive at that address (especially bank cards).

Since not everyone has a network of trusted people abroad, our community can lend a hand again. Generally, if you have a home, you will have no problem putting one or more utility bills that you do not need for your own KYC in someone else’s name. Although many banks now request a tax identification number and, in some cases, even a residence permit, it is never necessary to present several additional expense bills. Thus, you can reach an agreement with other people and have them pay your bills, which would benefit both parties. Of course, other agreements can also be reached, for example, that the owner of the property receives a fixed amount and continues to pay their bills even though the bill is in the name of the other party (in many cases, it is possible for the utility bill to be in one person’s name and for another person to pay it). Of course, in this case it is also advisable to know each other to rule out illegal use, as the verified address may be linked to the exchange of bank details or regulatory conditions, but of course the risk is quite low, as there is no law prohibiting a person from paying the utility bill of a family member or friend.

The payment of additional expenses does not in itself entail any real tax obligation. This always depends on the actual availability of a home or actual residence, never on what is listed as an address on a document. In many cases, this circumstance can be exploited.

Having a utility bill in an EU country can be very useful for accessing specific EU banks and platforms that would otherwise be inaccessible. A sustainable setup for any Perpetual Tourist includes compliance addresses in several regional blocks for maximum flexibility in financial matters. In the case of cryptocurrencies, however, it is recommended to have an address outside the EU for stock exchange verification due to strict MICA regulations in the EU.

In some cases, the utility bill is no longer necessary. A rental agreement, which can be easily created between the parties, is sufficient. In addition, many still have bank or credit card statements from their home countries, which they can also use once they have changed their residence to verify their residence without incurring tax obligations. However, it generally makes sense to acquire a paper address outside your home country so that information about your income is not exchanged with your home country.

The Denationalize.me matching service and how you can participate

Our matching service is simple for both parties. You register in our database using the corresponding offer form. If there is a match between supply and demand, we will put you in touch. If not, you will have to wait until a match occurs. Please refrain from inquiring about the current status. We cannot guarantee any actual matches. The fewer requirements you have in terms of destination countries and remuneration, the easier it will be for both parties to find a suitable solution.

There is no demand database; instead, we always conduct an individual and personalized search in relation to the client. When we deem it appropriate, we will actively propose possibilities to you.

Denationalize.me does not, of course, assume any guarantee or responsibility for the management of the database. Ultimately, it is a voluntary contract or verbal agreement between two adults. We only create the free market in which these agreements can be reached. All personal data recorded is confidential and only known to the Denationalize.me team. If there is a real match, it is transmitted to establish contact between both parties. “Applicants” have access to an anonymous list of offers to choose their favorite. Likewise, by registering, you agree that “applicants” may contact you if they are interested in your offer.

Inclusion in the database is free and without obligation for providers; a commission is only charged for the effective hiring by the provider. We will contact you about this as soon as the match between both parties enters its decisive phase and we will ask both parties to sign a disclaimer for us. We are not responsible for the misconduct of either party and, in any case, we can only filter the selection based on our knowledge of the individuals when necessary.

We hope you like this opportunity to take the mutual benefits of our Denationalize.me community to the next level. Register now in our database and enjoy more freedom and less tax waste!